I believe what we see in the likes of MTG and others like her is what the founders viewed what would be the make-up of the House. Hot headed boisterous individuals constantly clamoring for all sorts of impossibilities.
She has the support of 74% of her district is telling. Those individuals who voted for didn't vote for her to legislate for them, but to be as disruptive as she could. She wasn't sent there to help in getting help from the Federal government, but to be a disruptive force. Which on its face in nonsensical, as it prevents any meaningful legislation from being accomplished impacting the well being of the country, because House has to spend time dealing with nut cases like her.